MBC Applying New Developments

CE / CME

Applying the Latest Developments in Metastatic Breast Cancer Through Education of Healthcare Professionals, Patients, and Caregivers

Nurses: 1.50 Nursing contact hours

Physicians: maximum of 1.50 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits

Pharmacists: 1.50 contact hours (0.15 CEUs)

Released: October 19, 2023

Expiration: October 18, 2024

Joyce O'Shaughnessy
Joyce O'Shaughnessy, MD

Activity

Progress
1
Course Completed

Introduction

In this activity, Joyce O’Shaughnessy, MD, reviews the latest data supporting state-of-the-art treatment for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and discusses new clinical trials likely to change the future treatment landscape for MBC.

Please note that the slide thumbnails in this activity link to the PowerPoint slideset associated with this program, which also can be found here. The slideset can be downloaded by clicking on any of the thumbnails within the activity.

Clinical Care Options plans to measure the educational impact of this activity. Some questions will be asked twice: once at the beginning of the activity, and once again after the discussion that informs the best choice. Your responses will be aggregated for analysis, and your specific responses will not be shared. Thank you in advance for helping us assess the impact of this education.

Before continuing with this educational activity, please take a moment to answer the following questions.

If you are a healthcare professional providing patient care, how many patients with advanced/metastatic breast cancer do you see in a typical month?

A 57-year-old postmenopausal woman presents with a 7-cm left breast mass and a suspicious 5-cm mass in the liver and no other visceral involvement. Fine-needle aspiration of left axillary lymph nodes confirms presence of breast cancer in ≥4 lymph nodes. Patient proceeds with bilateral mastectomy, and liver biopsy reveals MBC. Pathology report indicates estrogen receptor (ER) 100%, progesterone receptor (PgR) 60%, HER2 negative by immunohistochemistry (IHC); ESR1 mutated; Ki-67 29%; BRCA and PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) unknown.​

Which of the following would you select as the optimal therapy based on tumor characteristics and the latest guideline recommendations?

Your 75-year-old patient with early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery for localized disease 1 year ago. She now presents with what appears to be metastatic disease progression in the lungs and hip bones leading to a small fracture. Biopsy confirms recurrent metastatic TNBC.

Based on clinical evidence and expert recommendations, which of the following biomarkers can help determine the optimal next line of therapy for this patient?

The ongoing phase III CAPItello-291 trial is evaluating capivasertib plus fulvestrant vs fulvestrant with placebo in men and postmenopausal women with HR-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC) who had disease recurrence on or after fewer than 12 months from end of AI therapy or after prior AI therapy for advanced disease. Which of the following statements is most accurate regarding the progression-free survival (PFS) outcomes in this trial?

Your patient is a 49-year-old postmenopausal woman with history of metastatic TNBC with progression on several chemotherapy regimens, including together with immunotherapy. She is now receiving sacituzumab govitecan to manage her progressive disease and is tolerating it well. However, on cycle 3, Day 8, laboratory assessments show a marked decrease in absolute neutrophil count (ANC) to 500/µL.  

In addition to initiating granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), which of the following evidence-based approaches would be most appropriate to manage this patient’s grade 4 neutropenia while she is receiving sacituzumab govitecan?

How often do you share resources with patients about available molecular testing, treatment options, AE management, copays, and other financial assistance programs?