Hematology 2021 Leukemias

CME

Key Studies in Leukemias: Independent Conference Coverage of ASH 2021

Physicians: Maximum of 1.00 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit

Released: April 06, 2022

Expiration: April 05, 2023

Activity

Progress
1
Course Completed

References

  1. Pollyea DA, Pratz KW, Wei AH, et al. Outcomes in patients with poor-risk cytogenetics with or without TP53 mutations treated with venetoclax combined with hypomethylating agents. Presented at: 63rd ASH Annual Meeting; December 11-14, 2021. Abstract 224.
  2. Herold T, Rothenberg-Thurley M, Grunwald VV, et al. Validation and refinement of the revised 2017 European LeukemiaNet genetic risk stratification of acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2020;34:3161-3172.
  3. DiNardo CD, Jonas BA, Pullarkat V, et al. Azacitidine and venetoclax in previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:617-629.
  4. Chen S, Xie J, Yang X, et al. Venetoclax plus decitabine for young adults with newly diagnosed ELN adverse-risk acute myeloid leukemia: interim analysis of a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 trial. Presented at: 63rd ASH Annual Meeting; December 11-14, 2021. Abstract 35.
  5. Kolitz JE, Strickland SA, Cortes JE, et al. Consolidation outcomes in CPX-351 versus cytarabine/daunorubicin-treated older patients with high-risk/secondary acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma. 2020;61:631-640.
  6. Grenet J, Jain AG, Burkart M, et al. Comparing outcomes between liposomal daunorubicin/cytarabine (CPX-351) and HMA+venetoclax as frontline therapy in acute myeloid leukemia. Presented at: 63rd ASH Annual Meeting; December 11-14, 2021. Abstract 32.
  7. Venetoclax prescribing information. North Chicago, IL: AbbVie Inc.; 2020.
  8. DiNardo CD, Maiti A, Rausch CR, et al. 10-day decitabine with venetoclax for newly diagnosed intensive chemotherapy ineligible, and relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia: a single-centre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2020;7:e724-e736.
  9. Short NJ, Montalban-Bravo G, Hwang H, et al. Prognostic and therapeutic impacts of mutant TP53 variant allelic frequency in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. Blood Adv. 2020;4:5681-5689.
  10. Sallman DA, Asch AS, Kambhampati S, et al. The first-in-class anti-CD47 antibody magrolimab combined with azacitidine is well-tolerated and effective in AML patients: phase 1b results. Presented at: 62nd ASH Annual Meeting; December 5-8, 2020. Abstract 330.
  11. Daver N, Konopleva M, Maiti A, et al. Phase I/II study of azacitidine (AZA) with venetoclax (VEN) and magrolimab (Magro) in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed older/unfit or high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML. Presented at: 63rd ASH Annual Meeting; December 11-14, 2021. Abstract 371.
  12. Mardis ER, Ding L, Dooling DJ, et al. Recurring mutations found by sequencing an acute myeloid leukemia genome. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1058-1066.
  13. Ward PS, Patel J, Wise DR, et al. The common feature of leukemia-associated IDH1 and IDH2 mutations is a neomorphic enzyme activity converting alpha-ketoglutarate to 2-hydroxyglutarate. Cancer Cell. 2010;17:225-234.
  14. Patel KP, Ravandi F, Ma D, et al. Acute myeloid leukemia with IDH1 or IDH2 mutation: frequency and clinicopathologic features. Am J Clin Pathol. 2011;135:35-45.
  15. DiNardo CD, Ravandi F, Agresta S, et al. Characteristics, clinical outcome, and prognostic significance of IDH mutations in AML. Am J Hematol. 2015;90:732-736.
  16. Ivosidenib prescribing information Cambridge, MA: Agios Pharmaceuticals; 2019.
  17. DiNardo CD, Stein AS, Stein EM, et al. Mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 inhibitor ivosidenib in combination with azacitidine for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:57-65.
  18. Montesinos P, Recher C, Vives S, et al. AGILE: a global, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study of ivosidenib + azacitidine versus placebo + azacitidine in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia with an IDH1 mutation. Presented at: 63rd ASH Annual Meeting; December 11-14, 2021. Abstract 697.
  19. Wei AH, Montesinos P, Ivanov V, et al. Venetoclax plus LDAC for newly diagnosed AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy: a phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled trial. Blood. 2020;135:2137-2145.
  20. Kantarjian HM, Thomas XG, Dmoszynska A, et al. Multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III trial of decitabine versus patient choice, with physician advice, of either supportive care or low-dose cytarabine for the treatment of older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2670-2677.
  21. DiNardo CD, Pratz K, Pullarkat V, et al. Venetoclax combined with decitabine or azacitidine in treatment-naive, elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2019;133:7-17.
  22. Gilteritinib prescribing information. Northbrook, IL: Astellas Pharma US, Inc.; 2019.
  23. Ueno Y, Mori M, Kamiyama Y, et al. Evaluation of gilteritinib in combination with chemotherapy in preclinical models of FLT3-ITD + acute myeloid leukemia. Oncotarget. 2019;10:2530-2545.
  24. Wang ES, Montesinos P, Minden MD, et al. Phase 3, open-label, randomized study of gilteritinib and azacitidine vs azacitidine for newly diagnosed FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia in patients ineligible for intensive induction chemotherapy. Presented at: 63rd ASH Annual Meeting; December 11-14, 2021. Abstract 700.
  25. Zeidan AM, Qi CZ, Yang H, et al. Gilteritinib vs salvage chemotherapy in FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia: number needed to treat for clinical outcomes per a secondary analysis of the ADMIRAL trial. Leuk Lymphoma. 2021;1-3.
  26. Ohanian M, Garcia-Manero G, Levis M, et al. Sorafenib combined with 5-azacytidine in older patients with untreated FLT3-ITD mutated acute myeloid leukemia. Am J Hematol. 2018;93:1136-1141.
  27. Konopleva M, Thirman M, Pratz KW, et al. Results of venetoclax and azacitidine combination in chemotherapy ineligible untreated patients with acute myeloid leukemia with FLT3 mutations. Presented at: 62nd ASH Annual Meeting; December 5-8, 2020. Abstract 1904.
  28. Cortes JE, Khaled S, Martinelli G, et al. Quizartinib versus salvage chemotherapy in relapsed or refractory FLT3-ITD acute myeloid leukaemia (QuANTUM-R): a multicentre, randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:984-997.
  29. Yilmaz M, Muftuoglu M, Kantarjian H, et al. Quizartinib (Quiz) with decitabine (DAC) and venetoclax (VEN) Is highly active in patients (pts) with FLT3-ITD mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) – RAS/MAPK mutations continue to drive primary and secondary resistance. Presented at: 63rd ASH Annual Meeting; December 11-14, 2021. Abstract 370.
  30. Scholl S, Fleischmann M, Schnetzke U, et al. Molecular mechanisms of resistance to FLT3 inhibitors in acute myeloid leukemia: ongoing challenges and future treatments. Cells. 2020;9:2493.
  31. Ma J, Zhao S, Qiao X, et al. Inhibition of BCL-2 synergistically enhances the antileukemic activity of midostaurin and gilteritinib in preclinical models of FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25:6815-6826.
  32. Daver N, Perl AE, Maly J, et al. Venetoclax in combination with gilteritinib demonstrates molecular clearance of FLT3 mutation in relapsed/refractory FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia. Presented at: 63rd ASH Annual Meeting; December 11-14, 2021. Abstract 691.
  33. Perl AE, Martinelli G, Cortes JE, et al. Gilteritinib or chemotherapy for relapsed or refractory FLT3-mutated AML. N Engl J Med. 2019; 381:1728-1740.
  34. Hughes TP, Mauro MJ, Cortes JE, et al. Asciminib in chronic myeloid leukemia after ABL kinase inhibitor failure. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:2315-2326.
  35. Réa D, Mauro MJ, Boquimpani C, et al. A phase 3, open-label, randomized study of asciminib, a STAMP inhibitor, vs bosutinib in CML after 2 or more prior TKIs. Blood. 2021;138:2031-2041.
  36. Hochhaus A, Boquimpani C, Rea D, et al. Efficacy and safety results from ASCEMBL, a multicenter, open-label, phase 3 study of asciminib, a first-in-class STAMP inhibitor, vs bosutinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase previously treated with ≥2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Presented at: 62nd ASH Annual Meeting; December 5-8, 2020. Abstract LBA-4.
  37. Mauro MJ, Minami Y, Rea D, et al. Efficacy and safety results from ASCEMBL, a multicenter, open-label, phase 3 study of asciminib, a first-in-class STAMP inhibitor, vs bosutinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase after ≥2 prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors: update after 48 weeks. Presented at: 63rd ASH Annual Meeting; December 11-14, 2021. Abstract 310.
  38. Naqvi K, Jabbour E, Skinner J, et al. Long-term follow-up of lower dose dasatinib (50 mg daily) as frontline therapy in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. Cancer. 2020;126:67-75.
  39. Sasaki K, Jabbour EJ, Issa GC, et al. Low-Dose dasatinib 50 mg/day versus standard-dose dasatinib 100 mg/day as frontline therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: a propensity score analysis. Presented at: 63rd ASH Annual Meeting; December 11-14, 2021. Abstract 631.
  40. Göekbuget N. Treatment of older patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia drugs. Aging. 2018;35:11-26.
  41. Göekbuget N. Treatment of older patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2016;573-579.
  42. Stock W, Luger SM, Advani AS, et al. A pediatric regimen for older adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of CALGB 10403. Blood. 2019;133:1548-1559.
  43. Göekbuget N, Stelljes M, Viardot A, et al. First results of the risk-adapted, MRD-stratified GMALL trial 08/2013 in 705 adults with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (ALL/LBL). Presented at: 63rd ASH Annual Meeting; December 11-14, 2021. Abstract 362.