Ask AI
ADCs in Solid Tumors Pharmacy Perspective

CE

Insight on Safety and Efficacy of ADCs in Solid Tumors: Focus on the Role of Oncology Pharmacists in Adverse Event Management

Pharmacists: 1.00 contact hour (0.1 CEUs)

Released: July 09, 2025

Expiration: January 08, 2026

Activity

Progress
1 2
Course Completed

Introduction

In this module, Allison Butts, PharmD, BCOP, and Danielle Roman, PharmD, BCOP, provide an overview of the latest evidence on antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) for solid tumors with a focus on the role of the oncology pharmacist in identifying and managing treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).

The key points discussed in this module are illustrated with thumbnails from the accompanying downloadable PowerPoint slideset, which can be found here or downloaded by clicking on any of the slide thumbnails in the module alongside the expert commentary.

Please note that Clinical Care Options plans to measure the educational impact of this activity. Some questions are asked twice: once at the beginning of the activity, and once again after the discussion that informs the best choice. Your responses will be aggregated for analysis, and your individual responses will not be shared. Thank you in advance for helping us assess the impact of this education.

Before continuing with this educational activity, please take a moment to answer the following questions.

How many people with solid tumors do you provide care for in a typical month?

When discussing the unique characteristics of ADCs with patients, which of the following would you tell them about potential for a “bystander effect”?

The patient is a 52-year-old woman with diagnosis of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (HER2 immunohistochemistry [IHC] 0) status post right breast mastectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation. One year later, she developed pulmonary metastases that were biopsy confirmed TNBC (PD-L1 negative) with no actionable mutations. She received capecitabine for 8 months then had disease progression. She was then initiated on sacituzumab govitecan. The patient presents to clinic prior to cycle 2, Day 1 and complains of diarrhea for 7 days after cycle 1, Day 8.

Soon after her infusion on cycle 1, Day 8, she experiences abdominal cramping and has 5 stools over baseline in the next 24 hours (grade 2). Which of the following strategies would you recommend to reduce the risk of cholinergic diarrhea at her next infusion?

How confident are you in applying evidence-based communication and shared decision-making strategies when tailoring individuals’ treatment plans?